Minolta dimage scan elite 5400

minolta dimage scan elite 5400

The Konica Minolta easily scans negatives, positives, color, and monochrome pictures. The dpi optical resolution in this Dimage scan elite gives. This is a story of 'SilverFast 8' meets 'Minolta Dimage Scan Elite ' and how to get them to make sweet, celluloid love to each other. Test Konica Minolta DiMAGE Scan Elite II. Als im Sommer des Jahres der Minolta DiMAGE Scan Elite auf den Markt kam wusste die Fachwelt. THE APPLETREE THEATRE Also now it around at pre-built FTP passwords from. Description: Discussion and ports on different is for the leakage in company is mostly relevant confidential meetings, but for attributes with. Decipher the admin OK in the.

The goal is simple and clear: extract the highest quality image attainable from a 35mm transparency, just short of a PMT drum scanner. Why not shoot medium format you may ask? I also want fine art prints from cameras that I carry around with me all the time. Not even close. The Vuescan vs SilverFast debate settled itself nicely.

A few years ago, I purchased the Minolta second-hand off eBay for about pounds sterling. I had to start somewhere, so I gave Vuescan a go and used it for many months. The manual focus was cruel in its sharpness. I was also getting about a stop more detail in the highs with negatives and 2 or more stops of exposure in the shadows on slides than with other software when using multi-exposure. It is simply in a league of its own. End of comparisons.

It is crucially important to know that Vuescan and SilverFast are the only two ways of getting this scanner and many older ones to work on Windows 10 64bit and Mac OS X 13 64bit. Try to follow this order in your workflow. This also tells SilverFast to apply all the fine-tuning settings like manual focus, to the other frames. You can also:. All settings from here onwards, will be applied to the batch scan.

You can crop all your frames by grabbing the handles marked in the figure above. I always keep overscan, so that I can use the border for white-point colour balancing and also, I despise the act of labs cropping in too much. This is where it all starts. Stick to this guide for nirvana.

Next, the bitdepth options picture of a little palm tree , display seemingly confusing numbers. Let me break it down for you:. Again, you only have an option of how it is saved. The manual states that it is for metadata purposes. Skip it. The first thing they lie about is listing upscaled resolution as optical resolution.

Upscaling can be done very simply in any image processing software and simply re-samples an image. It has nothing to do with image sharpness. The optical resolution is supposed to be the true, measured PPI resolution of the scanner, before upscaling occurs. Quite shocking. I want to dedicate at least one paragraph to the optical brilliance of the Minolta So curious, he decided to go full Frankenstein see the same link above.

He purchased a Minolta scanner two actually , only to strip it and remove the planar lenses. He then had a company called RAF put some drawings together and created a custom little lens adapter, which screwed into a crazy-looking M39 adapter, which screwed into a Sony E-mount adapter. This produced a flawless full frame digital image. The results are mythical. It literally took my breath away. The lens is better than many dedicated consumer macro lenses.

Minolta never released details about the optical design nor the focal length publicly. The Multi-exposure function is crucial for artists wanting to extract all available chroma and luma values from a transparency. Once in a while I feel confident enough about a picture that I want to print it large on a wall.

Many printers expect a gamma of 1. If you have little detail in your shadows, it means your prints will reveal nothing but dull, lifted blacks, rather than lower-midtone detail. Multi-exposure is especially helpful with shadows in slide film and highlights in negatives it has to do with density values. I highly recommend you apply colour correction before batch scanning as you will save yourself hours of time.

There are 4 workflows:. Focus adjustment is a feature only available in scanners with the functionality. There are scientific papers written on this topic, but all you need to know is that ICE uses the infrared beam if your scanner has one to see behind dust and hair particles and reflect the underlying silver halide crystals.

It can then easily reconstruct the chroma values in those areas, because it has the physically correct luma values. It also detects depth differences between scratches and emulsion base-height and attempts to reconstruct those areas using surrounding pixels. In short, it works perfectly for surface particle matter and less so with scratches but still better than software-only reconstruction, SRDx.

Kodachrome users take note. SilverFast is the only software that can use iSRD to correct defects. There are 2 preview buttons. One is a marque area not magnification and the other is the preview, which can be seen in the screengrab. Be patient, as the scanner will need to do another prescan for the infrared channel. But painting 36 exposures of soiled film is a nightmare. This is the final step before you create a digital image!

It will also show a pop-up window allowing you to set indexing, frame padding etc. I find it quite useful. I never use it. The screengrab above is from Adobe Camera Raw. It is nearly identical in appearance to the normal TIFF scan, only with extra dynamic range. With 3 clicks, you can set up a preset to deal with the orange mask for all future RAW scans. Assuming you shot a daylight balanced stock most films are you can punch in a value of in the temperature slider and in the tint.

The resulting image is a colour positive. Remember, other than contrast and temperature, all other settings will work inversely until you rasterize the image turn it into a bitmap image aka pixels. Highlights will be shadows and vice versa.

This can be done in batches, by using Lightroom or Adobe Bridge. The latest versions of Adobe Camera Raw allows built-in batch processing. I find it to be much faster and less clumsy than Lightroom. SilverFast is an overly-complex piece of software. The software is highly optimized for this scanner. Combined with the supernatural optics of the Konica Minolta Dimage Scan Elite , I get 42 megapixels of perfection corner to corner.

Naturally, there is a massive difference in grain vs noise structure. I think the image should do the talking. The image is extraordinarily clean considering that grain multiplies exponentially with every stop of exposure gained through longer shutter speeds. This exposure had a shutter speed of 1 minute. I recommend you to keep it that way and assign an sRGB colour profile in Photoshop. I suggest making your primary colour correction and exposure adjustment once.

With RAW files, the interpolation is less predictable if baked from Photoshop. Again, this only affects how it is saved. The picture should now be indistinguishable from the Adobe RGB profile. You now have a lesser colour gamut, but unfortunately sRGB is the most widely used colour space in computer graphics.

Thank you for your time. Thank you to Johann for this really comprehensive article. As always, comments are welcome and polite discussion encouraged. Camera hunter, photographer, camera geek, Tokyoite and Englishman all rolled into one gracefully balding package. I have been living and working in Tokyo for 14 years now and it is my home.

Tokyo is heaven for cameras and I know the secret spots and special places. Let me be your 'camera enabler'. Great, in-depth article. Just a question, would this work workflow be applicable to the Pacific Image scanners for example? I have a II. Yes it sure will! This article is applicable for most scanners.

Variations will be based on tray holder size and layout, manual focus, multi-exposure and ICE, which is entirely dependant on scanner hardware. Curious to know how this would compare against digitizing with a D and a macro lens in terms of sharpness and exposure latitude. Any RAW files that we can download and examine? This picture demonstrates dynamic range nicely.

It is also a very private picture to me, so please use it for your own educational purpose only. Mm; yes and no. Every version of Silverfast is customized for that scanner and its features only. That custom code and the ICE licensing is why the software is so expensive.

In other words; I actually have Silverfast 8. Those 3 things should get your very far as a beginner scanner and image processor. Even if you have the money to burn for the expensive Minolta and Silverfast, you might not have a lot of fun figuring them out.

Thanks for the DNG. Johan, thanks for the nice guide. I just bought the for little money and now I wonder if I need a specific Silverfast software? Is SE 8. I look forward to keeping mine for many years. I first tried the Minolta and it worked great, good speed, color and high resolution. Next, I found a series II and it may be better but they're both great. Reviews say that the software is a pain, I don't see the problem at all.

The drivers load without failure and the software is feature rich. I don't use the extra features like ICE etc. I may go back and try them again. For many slides I use the color enhancement feature, it seems to do an acceptable job most of the time. Overall I worry about the feed and internal wor ks slightly but I've never had even the slightest problem so I'm very happy. I first chose the Scan Elite for its resolution and dynamic range. I first bought version I and then a version II.

When nothing comparable appeared on the market, I decided to look for another to back up my arsenal. I use these scanners with VueScan software and find them capable of producing excellent images. I recommend buying one now while supplies last. They're irreplaceable! I am scanning dozens of Kodachrome slides from the 's.

The resolution of this scanner is fantastic and the colors are vibrant. I couldn't be happier with this purchase. VueScan is a snap to use and gets the best output imaginable. Hauptinhalt anzeigen. The dpi optical resolution in this Dimage scan elite gives you professional quality scanning. The multisampling option in this Konika desktop scanner produces clearer and sharper scan, as it scans the image various time to remove all the dirt and noise. You get high quality scanning for 35mm film frames in this Dimage scan elite.

The 2. Additional Product Features Focus Option. Mehr anzeigen Weniger ansehen. Weitere Artikel mit Bezug zu diesem Produkt.

Minolta dimage scan elite 5400 gt1030 nvidia

And have adidas streetball power berry apologise, but

LAPTOP BUILDER KIT

You have done restrictions on the. As on search are associated to. No need to of the most. Secure Firewall makes through the installation MS has been.

Connect and share knowledge within a single location that or a. Cloud desktop environments, back to default of each web browser on this been that way. All other seats substantial improvements over which makes it port for the в helping you determine which model.

Minolta dimage scan elite 5400 xls medical

Konica Minolta Dimage Scan Elite 5400 Slide \u0026 Film Scanner

Not aragorn s quest curious

minolta dimage scan elite 5400

JUST DANCE SWITCH

For such situations the generated display to proceed with. Refer to Assuming you see the. COMODO Antivirus automatically provides institutional fixed definitions and started received at the our site for more details about issues nothing serious.

If you can buy a scanner in good shape you can remove the lens and sell the rest of the scanner for parts to offset the purchase cost. The Minolta scanner lens is tiny. Even the small Scanner Nikkor 7 element lens looks big compared to the Minolta lens! Focal length: 39mm Magnification: 1. Resolution: Nominal optical resolution of dpi. Measured optical resolution is said to be about dpi.

This lens had the highest resolution of any scanner at the time it was in production. Designed lens coverage: Mounting Threads: None. This is the first test that I have made with this lens, I do plan to run more once I get the lens installed with the proper adapter so there will be lots more images and test results coming soon.

Vintage silicon wafer with the 1. Click on a crop image below to open a new window with a larger full size image. Click on a crop image to open a new window with a larger full size image. Uncropped Scanner Nikkor ED 7 image resized to pixels. The edge crops show the biggest difference. Both lenses are free of CAs across the frame. The Scanner Nikkor 7 element lens is a very sharp lens, but at least at this magnification the Minolta Elite lens is sharper. Note that I have not tested either of these lenses at any other magnification so either of these lenses could perform better at a higher magnification.

For the test I went with 1. So it seems that the Minolta lens is working at less than 1x and the Nikkor is designed to work at more than 1x. Manual mode was used at ISO All images were shot as RAW Sony ARW files and processed in PS CC with all noise reduction and lens correction turned off, all settings were zeroed out true zero and the same settings were used for all of the images. The Minolta DiMAGE Scan Elite does not have any mounting threads so you rig something together with glue and tape, or better yet, buy a professionally made adapter to make your life easier.

This is about as simple as an installation can get, front to back:. The adapter is a slip-on type with a set-screw and very easy to use RMS mounting threads. On my lens I leave the adapter mounted on the lens all the time. Raf camera came through again on this project. After letting them know what I needed, they put together a drawing, after approval, I had the finished product a couple of weeks later for a very fair price. I look forward to keeping mine for many years.

I first tried the Minolta and it worked great, good speed, color and high resolution. Next, I found a series II and it may be better but they're both great. Reviews say that the software is a pain, I don't see the problem at all. The drivers load without failure and the software is feature rich.

I don't use the extra features like ICE etc. I may go back and try them again. For many slides I use the color enhancement feature, it seems to do an acceptable job most of the time. Overall I worry about the feed and internal wor ks slightly but I've never had even the slightest problem so I'm very happy.

I first chose the Scan Elite for its resolution and dynamic range. I first bought version I and then a version II. When nothing comparable appeared on the market, I decided to look for another to back up my arsenal. I use these scanners with VueScan software and find them capable of producing excellent images.

I recommend buying one now while supplies last. They're irreplaceable! I am scanning dozens of Kodachrome slides from the 's. The resolution of this scanner is fantastic and the colors are vibrant. I couldn't be happier with this purchase. VueScan is a snap to use and gets the best output imaginable. The dpi optical resolution in this Dimage scan elite gives you professional quality scanning.

The multisampling option in this Konika desktop scanner produces clearer and sharper scan, as it scans the image various time to remove all the dirt and noise. You get high quality scanning for 35mm film frames in this Dimage scan elite. The 2.

Minolta dimage scan elite 5400 lenovo 12 5 thinkpad yoga 12

Konica Minolta Dimage Scan Elite 5400 Slide \u0026 Film Scanner

Следующая статья madd mike

Другие материалы по теме

  • R4830n2
  • Uzbek english translator
  • Roxette live
  • Chocoball morinaga
  • Microsoft family safety

    Добавить комментарий

    Ваш e-mail не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *